zobacz powiększenie


DOI 10.12887/36-2023-3-143-10



Łukasz Sarowski, Małgorzata Gruchoła, Social Robotics in the Perspective of (Non)Anthropocentrism


Cena brutto: 7,00 PLN za szt.

We currently witness a process of domesticating artificial intelligence in the form of, among others, the so-called humanoid companion robots; the process in question may lead to a kind of “socialization” of such robots. The purpose of the article was—through an analysis of the specialist literature and products of social robotics—to show that such domesticating makes us aware of the necessity to develop, considering anthropocentric principles, criteria and rules to regulate the functioning of robots in social life. Four dimensions of anthropocentrism (cognitive, ontological, methodological, and axiological) were analyzed in the context of the need to clarify ethical, social, and legal rules for the use of humanoid robots in society. The author applied analytical-descriptive and synthetic methods. The conclusions make it possible to partly confirm the research hypothesis, i.e., the claim that the process of domesticating AI technology in the form of humanoid robots implies the need for their “socialization” in all four dimensions of anthropocentrism. The literature analysis shows that the development of social robotics is changing the perception and ways of analysis of social phenomena in which robotic technologies play an increasingly important role. Robots perform social functions and tasks which have so far been the domain of humans. Although from an ontological perspective, the formal criteria of subjectivity for robots have not been developed and robots have not been granted legal subjectivity, the intensive development of robotic technologies, by changing the position of robots in society, favours informal and discretionary granting them subjectivity. It seems justifiable to say that granting legal subjectivity to humanoid robots will generate changes in all areas of anthropocentrism. 

Keywords: social robotics, artificial intelligence technology, criteria of anthropocentrism

Contact: Department of Language, Rhetoric, and Media Law, Institute of Journalism and Management, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Al. Racławickie 14, Lublin, Poland
E-mail: (Łukasz Sarowski) lukasz.sarowski@kul.pl; (Małgorzata Gruchoła) malgorzata.gruchola@kul.pl 
Phone (Małgorzata Gruchoła) +48 81 4455304
ORCID: (Małgorzata Gruchoła) ORCID: 0000-0002-2367-0416



Pliki do pobrania:

» Sarowski_Gruchola.pdf


  1. ISSN 0860-8024
  2. e-ISSN 2720-5355
  3. The Republic of Poland Ministry of Science and Higher Education Value: 100.00
  4. Quarterly “Ethos” is indexed by the following databases: EBSCO, CEEOL, Index Copernicus (ICV 2017: 55.26), Philosopher’s Index, ERIH Plus.
  5. DOI Prefix 10.12887